
A mind map starts with a central or main topic with related ideas radiating from it, branches added as sub-topics develop. Colours and graphics are important to a memorable mind-map.
In Tony Buzan's concept, each branch should consist ideally of one word that captures the heart of the idea. Each sub-topic should have a different colour, preferably one which illuminates the topic.
In my own situation, I use mind-maps for a number of functions such as sermon preparation, lesson preparations and the like. I find that mind-mapping allows good thinking and space to be creative while allowing spontaneity and freedom when speaking.
Sometimes, when I'm confronted by highly complex situations that seem to have no pattern or solution, I will produce a mind-map to analyse the situation. It's amazing how seemingly unrelated phenomena can be seen to be connected when you lay everything out.
Traditionally mind-maps were drawn by hand, but for the artistically challenged like myself, there are many computer software programs which do the job well. The best allow for insertion of graphics, notes and even spreadsheets. Most allow for the spreadsheet to be exported to standard text or graphic formats. For me, spell checking is an important feature, as I find it hard to see spelling mistakes on screen, but get annoyed when I see them printed.
Another important factor in software is that the printed output has to be readable at a distance. When I am speaking, my notes are quite some distance from me. Some programs fit the map onto the page by squishing everything, including the text. This makes it hard to read them without picking up the page and peering closely at the text!
At the moment I am using VUE and XMind, after trying about half a dozen different programs.
If you've never used mind maps before, take a look at this site os this one
It sounds reasonable for purposes of exploring an area.What I don't get (without having read the book I realise) is how/why you'd use a mind map to present a sermon. Sermons are spoken, and therefore delivered linearly.Is mind mapping meant to work equally for everyone?My natural inclination in preparing a presentation is to build a case then resolve at the conclusion. Apparently this is a typical Japanese approach, but it is quite different to the "make your claim, give 3 supporting points, and restate your claim" we were taught in high school.Some people readily work at multiple levels of abstraction. Some don't, and find allegories, metaphors, and conceptual talk yield little to appreciate.So, does mind mapping work for everyone? Does it matter whether one's conscious thought is more left- or right-brain? Whether one is more visually or auditorily biased?
ReplyDeleteEven with a sermon, or any spoken presentation, the linearity is only chronological, not necessarily logical. There is a lot of creativity needed in bridging the gap from written Word to the heard word and its application to 2 millennia later and half a world away.I find mind-mapping gets a lot of ideas out very quickly and helps to flesh out ideas and connections. When I'm presenting, I normally go clockwise around the points, although sometimes I decide that it's better to change the order.On any Sunday, I will use perhaps 75% of what is on the mind map (occasionally 0%), and then there will be other stuff that comes to mind as I'm speaking.I think mind maps probably work for everyone regardless of whether we are left or right brained. Those who are more logically minded will find extra growth through producing more graphically loaded info, while those who are more intuitive and creative will find structure emerging in their thinking.I used to be about as linear/logical as you can get, but I have found mind mapping brings out so much more from the intuitive/ creative bits of my brain.
ReplyDeleteHaven't looked at mind maps...do know that allergories don't work for me.
ReplyDeleteMaybe you need more histamines :D
ReplyDeleteSo not funny... - but you made me laugh anyway.
ReplyDelete:)
ReplyDelete