Saturday, July 5, 2008

More Global Warming Lies

Did you hear the reports this week that flat screen TVs are responsible for far more greenhouse gases than coal fired power stations? Sadly it was only partly true. In fact the gas mentioned in involved in all kinds of electronic devices, including solar power panels!

Here's an article from Andrew Bolt:

The Sydney Morning Herald finds another global warming scare to hype - and, revealingly, focuses on the symbol of modern affluence in this wicked consumer society:

THE rising demand for flat-screen televisions may have a greater impact on global warming than the worldu2019s largest coal-fired power stations, a leading environmental scientist has warned.

Manufacturers use a greenhouse gas called nitrogen trifluoride to make the televisions. As the sets have become more popular, annual production of the gas has risen to about 4000 tonnes.

As a driver of global warming, nitrogen trifluoride is 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide...

But, of course, it's a beat-up by ideologues. Physical Insights explains:

This has got nothing to do specifically with manufacturing plasma TVs, and everything to do with manufacturing semiconductor devices and materials such as polycrystalline silicon. One has to wonder what the emissions of sulfur hexafluoride, perfluorocarbons and/or nitrogen trifluoride are for the manufacturing of a typical plasma TV, and how it compares to the emissions of sulfur hexafluoride, perfluorocarbons and/or nitrogen trifluoride over the manufacturing of, say, one typical solar photovoltaic panel. Obviously a photovoltaic panel has got much more polycrystalline silicon in it than your TV



Article

3 comments:

  1. Well, how is it that they're just figuring this out now? The government agency that patrols such things must have realized the dangers (I'm sure these things must have to pass some type of testing - they keep telling us that it's very rigorous testing) and projected quantities is information that would be vital to the manufacturers to know if they needed to build new factories, modify existing ones etc.Years ago we heard on the news that hair dye caused cancer. My mother mentioned it and my dad researched the article. Turned out that the experimental rats had developed cancer all right - after eating the equivalent of 20 pounds of it per day. My dad's suggestion - just use it on your hair, don't eat huge quantities of it.There have been so many things that have turned out the same, so many partial truths - so much of it designed to be shocking and sell news - it's hard to know what to believe and just the time we get really skeptical and don't believe any of it, is probably the time it will be true. Maybe this time...Ahhhh - I guess I'm just getting old and suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The real problem is that journalists just edit press releases without ever doing their own research or even their own thinking. That's why "scientists" can dish up their alarmist rubbish, why politicians can announce the same project 20 times over as if it's something new, and why most of us really are sceptical about everything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How very true!!

    ReplyDelete