More Global Warming Lies- Part 2

I'm not trying to overdo the commentary on climate change hysteria but the release of the Garnaut report last week and another report claiming that we will have droughts every second year, just makes it difficulat to ignore.

I think a lot of people are making a lot of money (with bucket-loads to come) from trying to scare us into dismantling our economy.

Here is a commentary by Andrew Bolt that shows that Al Gore's infamous movie actually brought aobut instant cooling!

Gore cools planet

Dr Roy Spencer, US Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA’s Aqua satellite, updates his temperature graph:

When one takes into consideration that the cooling from the Mt. Pinatubo eruption and the warming from the 1997-98 El Nino event were not part of any underlying long-term trend, we can imagine that globally-averaged temperatures were flat from 1990 until 2000, then there was a brief warming until about 2002, after which temperatures have once again remained flat. Note that the longer temperatures remain flat the greater the warming that will be required to put us back ‘on track’ to match the climate model projections used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The coming months and years should be interesting.

Gore Lied scribbles with a red pen on Spencer’s graph to show the famous Gore Effect at its most magnificent. Almost as soon as Gore released An Inconvenient Truth, warning of catastrophic warming, temperatures started to fall:




MEANWHILE, Professor Fred Singer notes the refusal of warmist Clive Hamilton to debate sceptics, and sends Australia a message about such cause-pushers:

As an atmospheric physicist, I deal with facts: many independent measurements published by recognized experts and the published results from some two dozen climate models run by scientists who have specialized in this subdiscipline. The IPCC and nearly all scientists also accept these same facts—although the measurements are never perfect and the model results are based on many assumptions.

All I claim is that the observations disagree significantly with these model results… (O)nce one accepts that the models don’t represent reality, then “all the rest is only commentary” —to quote a biblical sage.

It means that the human-caused greenhouse effect is much smaller than the models calculate—and not significant compared to natural factors that rule the climate and are beyond human control.

Of course, unlike Hamilton, Singer does understand the science.

Article